This press release features multimedia. View the full release here: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260724090619/en/
Despite the headwinds of a 75 basis point decline in the Federal Funds Target Rate (“FFTR”) over the past 12 months, our Core Bank’s net interest income increased
During June, we successfully launched a new Republic Payment Solutions (“RPS”)(1) program after several years of cross-functional planning and execution. This program is expected to contribute over
Beyond our strong financial performance, we were honored to receive the Raymond James Community Bankers Cup for the second consecutive year. This prestigious recognition highlights the nation’s top-performing community banks based on profitability, operational efficiency, and balance sheet strength. We were also named to Forbes’ World’s Best Banks list during the second quarter, an honor based on an independent survey of more than 54,000 consumers across 34 countries that measures trust, customer service, digital capabilities, and financial advice. Among thousands of financial institutions evaluated worldwide, Republic was one of only 72 U.S. banks included on the list.
These recognitions reflect the dedication of our associates, the loyalty of our clients, and our commitment to disciplined execution. Since our founding, we have remained focused on delivering sophisticated financial solutions while preserving the relationship-driven, community-focused approach that defines Republic. We believe these honors validate our strategy and underscore the strength of our franchise. As we move through the remainder of 2026, we remain focused on disciplined growth, operational excellence, and creating long-term value for our shareholders,” concluded Pichel.
The following table highlights key metrics for the three and six months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| Total Company Financial Performance Highlights | Total Company Financial Performance Highlights | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| Three Months Ended |
| $ |
| % |
|
| Six Months Ended |
| $ |
| % |
| |||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
| 2026 |
| 2025 |
| Change |
| Change |
|
| 2026 |
| 2025 |
| Change |
| Change |
| |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Income Before Income Tax Expense |
|
| $ | 42,550 |
|
| $ | 40,390 |
|
| $ | 2,160 |
| 5 |
| % |
|
| $ | 97,935 |
|
| $ | 100,352 |
|
| $ | (2,417 | ) |
| (2 | ) | % |
|
Net Income |
|
|
| 32,866 |
|
|
| 31,484 |
|
|
| 1,382 |
| 4 |
|
|
|
|
| 75,435 |
|
|
| 78,752 |
|
|
| (3,317 | ) |
| (4 | ) |
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
|
| 1.68 |
|
|
| 1.61 |
|
|
| 0.07 |
| 4 |
|
|
|
|
| 3.85 |
|
|
| 4.03 |
|
|
| (0.18 | ) |
| (4 | ) |
|
|
Return on Average Assets ("ROA") |
|
|
| 1.88 | % |
|
| 1.79 | % |
|
| NA |
| 5 |
|
|
|
|
| 2.14 | % |
|
| 2.21 | % |
|
| NA |
| (3 | ) |
|
| |
Return on Average Equity ("ROE") |
|
|
| 11.42 |
|
|
| 11.96 |
|
|
| NA |
| (5 | ) |
|
|
|
| 13.32 |
|
|
| 15.28 |
|
|
| NA |
| (13 | ) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Results of Operations for the Second quarter of 2026 Compared to the Second quarter of 2025
Net income for the
Net Interest Income –
Significant factors impacting
Interest-Earning Assets
Core Bank average interest-earning cash declined to$257 million with a weighted-average yield of 3.74% during the second quarter of 2026, compared to$623 million with a yield of 4.45% during the second quarter of 2025. The decline in average interest-earning cash balances reflected the strategic deployment of excess liquidity into loan growth and longer-duration investment securities, which provided more attractive yields than overnight liquidity alternatives tied to the FFTR.Core Bank average investments increased to$912 million with a weighted-average yield of 4.15% during the second quarter of 2026, compared to$686 million with a yield of 3.71% during the second quarter of 2025 due to the previously referenced redeployment of interest-earning cash.- Traditional Banking average loans increased
$59 million to$4.65 billion with a weighted-average yield of 5.66% during the second quarter of 2026, compared to$4.59 billion with a yield of 5.69% during the second quarter of 2025.
Period-over-period comparisons of average loan balances and yields were negatively impacted by the sale of approximately$82 million of loans and lease financing receivables during the first quarter of 2026. These loans were transferred from held for investment to held for sale inDecember 2025 and contributed an estimated 5 basis points to the Traditional Banking loan portfolio yield during the second quarter of 2025.
Despite a 75 basis point decline in the FFTR over the past 12 months, strong new loan production, continued redeployment of cash flows from lower-yielding loan runoff into higher-yielding originations, and a favorable shift toward higher-spread lending categories largely offset the impact of lower market interest rates on loan portfolio yields. - Average outstanding Warehouse(1) lines of credit increased
$13 million , or 2%, to$580 million during the second quarter of 2026 from$567 million during the second quarter of 2025, while the weighted-average yield declined 61 basis points to 6.33%. Average committed Warehouse lines increased from$995 million to$1.17 billion over the same period, reflecting continued growth in customer relationships. Average utilization moderated from 57% to 50%, as growth in commitments outpaced growth in outstanding balances.
Funding Liabilities (Deposits and Borrowings)
As it relates to the Core Bank’s decline in interest expense and reduction in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities:
- The weighted-average cost of
Core Bank total interest-bearing deposits decreased 36 basis points to 1.98% during the second quarter of 2026 from 2.34% during the second quarter of 2025, while total average interest-bearing deposit balances increased$96 million , or 3%. Average balances benefited from a$235 million combined increase in money market and time deposit accounts, partially offset by a$139 million decline in brokered deposits, reciprocal deposits, and interest-bearing transaction accounts. Disciplined deposit pricing initiatives and a favorable shift in funding mix drove a meaningful reduction in the overall cost of interest-bearing deposits. - Average
Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances declined$211 million from the second quarter of 2025 to the second quarter of 2026, while the weighted-average cost decreased 26 basis points to 4.09%. During the second quarter of 2026, theCore Bank began realizing the benefit of theMarch 2026 prepayment of$220 million of higher-cost FHLB advances, which carried a weighted-average rate of 4.57%. The prepayment contributed to lower net funding costs and further supported net interest margin expansion during the quarter.
The following tables present, by reportable segment, the key drivers of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Interest Income |
|
| Net Interest Margin |
| ||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
| Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
| Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Reportable Segment |
| 2026 |
|
| 2025 |
| $ Change |
|
| 2026 |
| 2025 |
| % Change |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional Banking |
| $ | 60,375 |
|
| $ | 56,380 |
| $ | 3,995 |
|
| 4.16 | % |
| 3.84 | % |
|
| 0.32 | % |
|
Warehouse Lending |
|
| 3,744 |
|
|
| 3,549 |
|
| 195 |
|
| 2.59 |
|
| 2.51 |
|
|
| 0.08 |
|
|
Total |
| $ | 64,119 |
|
| $ | 59,929 |
| $ | 4,190 |
|
| 4.02 |
|
| 3.72 |
|
|
| 0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Average Loan Balances |
|
| Period-End Loan Balances |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
| Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Reportable Segment |
|
| 2026 |
|
| 2025 |
| $ Change |
| % Change |
|
|
| 2026 |
|
| 2025 |
| $ Change |
| % Change |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Traditional Banking |
| $ | 4,646,612 |
| $ | 4,587,342 |
| $ | 59,270 |
| 1 | % |
|
| $ | 4,655,509 |
| $ | 4,582,152 |
| $ | 73,357 |
|
| 2 |
| % |
|
Warehouse Lending |
|
| 580,065 |
|
| 566,707 |
|
| 13,358 |
| 2 |
|
|
|
| 614,696 |
|
| 671,773 |
|
| (57,077 | ) |
| (8 | ) |
|
|
Total |
| $ | 5,226,677 |
| $ | 5,154,049 |
| $ | 72,628 |
| 1 |
|
|
| $ | 5,270,205 |
| $ | 5,253,925 |
| $ | 16,280 |
|
| - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Provision for Expected Credit Losses(2) – The Core Bank’s Provision was a net credit of
The net credit of
- The Traditional Banking segment recorded a net credit to the Provision of
$143,000 during the second quarter of 2026. While period-end loan balances grew$59 million during the quarter, provision expense benefited from a favorable shift in portfolio composition. Specifically, construction and land development balances, which carry higher reserve requirements than most otherCore Bank lending categories, declined$30 million , as projects progressed and balances primarily migrated into the commercial real estate portfolio. This shift reduced reserve requirements and contributed meaningfully to the quarter’s provision benefit. - Warehouse Lending recorded a net credit to the Provision of
$38,000 for the second quarter of 2026 resulting from general formula reserves applied to a$15 million , or 2%, decrease in the outstanding Warehouse period-end balances for the period.
The net charge of
- The Traditional Banking segment recorded a net charge to the Provision of
$517,000 during the second quarter of 2025 related to a change in loan mix toward loans with higher formula reserve requirements in addition to$313,000 in net charge-offs. While Traditional Banking loan balances increased only$16 million during the second quarter of 2025, the growth occurred in categories with higher loan loss reserve requirements. - Warehouse Lending recorded a net charge to the Provision of
$255,000 for the second quarter of 2025 resulting from general formula reserves applied to a$102 million increase in the outstanding Warehouse period-end balances.
As a percentage of total loans, the Core Bank’s Allowance(2) increased 8 basis points from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| As of |
|
| As of |
|
| Year-over-Year Change |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Allowance |
|
| Allowance |
|
|
| ||||||
Reportable Segment |
| Gross Loans |
| Allowance |
| to Loans |
|
| Gross Loans |
| Allowance |
| to Loans |
|
| to Loans |
| % Change |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Traditional Banking |
| $ | 4,655,509 |
| $ | 63,806 | 1.37 | % |
| $ | 4,582,152 |
| $ | 59,055 | 1.29 | % |
| 0.08 |
| % | 6 |
| % |
| |||||
Warehouse Lending |
|
| 614,696 |
|
| 1,533 |
| 0.25 |
|
|
|
| 671,773 |
|
| 1,676 |
| 0.25 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
Total |
|
| 5,270,205 |
|
| 65,339 |
| 1.24 |
|
|
|
| 5,253,925 |
|
| 60,731 |
| 1.16 |
|
|
| 0.08 |
|
|
| 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Tax Refund Solutions |
|
| 156 |
|
| 1 |
| 0.64 |
|
|
|
| 95 |
|
| — |
| — |
|
|
| 0.64 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
Republic Credit Solutions |
|
| 140,045 |
|
| 22,427 |
| 16.01 |
|
|
|
| 119,000 |
|
| 21,029 |
| 17.67 |
|
|
| (1.66 | ) |
|
| (9 | ) |
|
|
|
| 140,201 |
|
| 22,428 |
| 16.00 |
|
|
|
| 119,095 |
|
| 21,029 |
| 17.66 |
|
|
| (1.66 | ) |
|
| (9 | ) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| $ | 5,410,406 |
| $ | 87,767 | 1.62 | % |
| $ | 5,373,020 |
| $ | 81,760 | 1.52 | % |
| 0.10 |
| % | 7 |
| % |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans Roll-Forward | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| 2026 |
|
|
| 2025 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
| Beginning |
|
|
|
| Charge- |
|
|
| Ending |
| Beginning |
|
|
|
| Charge- |
|
|
| Ending | ||||||||||||
Reportable Segment |
| Balance |
| Provision |
| offs |
| Recoveries |
| Balance |
| Balance |
| Provision |
| offs |
| Recoveries |
| Balance | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Traditional Banking |
| $ | 64,041 |
| $ | (143 | ) |
| $ | (360 | ) |
| $ | 268 |
| $ | 63,806 |
| $ | 58,851 |
| $ | 517 |
|
| $ | (470 | ) |
| $ | 157 |
| $ | 59,055 |
Warehouse Lending |
|
| 1,571 |
|
| (38 | ) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| 1,533 |
|
| 1,421 |
|
| 255 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| 1,676 |
Total |
|
| 65,612 |
|
| (181 | ) |
|
| (360 | ) |
|
| 268 |
|
| 65,339 |
|
| 60,272 |
|
| 772 |
|
|
| (470 | ) |
|
| 157 |
|
| 60,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Tax Refund Solutions |
|
| 6,344 |
|
| (1,046 | ) |
|
| (6,439 | ) |
|
| 1,142 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 25,981 |
|
| (3,932 | ) |
|
| (25,059 | ) |
|
| 3,010 |
|
| — |
Republic Credit Solutions |
|
| 19,884 |
|
| 6,384 |
|
|
| (4,244 | ) |
|
| 403 |
|
| 22,427 |
|
| 20,050 |
|
| 4,983 |
|
|
| (4,384 | ) |
|
| 380 |
|
| 21,029 |
|
| 26,228 |
|
| 5,338 |
|
|
| (10,683 | ) |
|
| 1,545 |
|
| 22,428 |
|
| 46,031 |
|
| 1,051 |
|
|
| (29,443 | ) |
|
| 3,390 |
|
| 21,029 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| $ | 91,840 |
| $ | 5,157 |
|
| $ | (11,043 | ) |
| $ | 1,813 |
| $ | 87,767 |
| $ | 106,303 |
| $ | 1,823 |
|
| $ | (29,913 | ) |
| $ | 3,547 |
| $ | 81,760 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
The table below presents the Core Bank’s credit quality metrics:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quarters Ended: | Years Ended: | ||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||
Core Banking Credit Quality Ratios | 2026 |
| 2025 |
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans to total loans | 0.58 | % | 0.41 | % | 0.45 | % | 0.44 | % | 0.39 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets to total loans (including OREO) | 0.60 |
| 0.43 |
| 0.47 |
| 0.46 |
| 0.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delinquent loans* to total loans | 0.35 |
| 0.19 |
| 0.26 |
| 0.20 |
| 0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs to average loans | 0.01 |
| 0.02 |
| 0.03 |
| 0.05 |
| 0.01 |
|
(Quarterly rates annualized) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OREO = Other Real Estate Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Loans 30-days-or-more past due at the time the second contractual payment is past due. | ||||||||||
Noninterest Income –
- Service charges on deposits increased
$562,000 , or 16%, and were the largest contributor to the increase in noninterest income, driven primarily by higher activity-based fee volumes, particularly insufficient funds fees. - Interchange income increased
$433,000 compared to the second quarter of 2025, primarily due to a$454,000 favorable adjustment to credit and debit card rewards accruals recorded during the second quarter of 2026. The adjustment aligned the Core Bank’s estimated rewards liability with expected payouts under its new rewards programs. - Other income decreased
$236,000 , primarily due to a nonrecurring$328,000 net gain recognized from the sale of the Bank’s consumer credit card portfolio during the second quarter of 2025.
Noninterest Expense –
RPG reported net income of
Tax Refund Solutions(1)
The TRS segment derives substantially all of its revenues during the first and second quarters of each year.
TRS reported net income of
During the second quarter of each year, the Company charges off all remaining unpaid Refund Advances (“RAs”). While charge-offs during both the second quarters of 2025 and 2026 were favorably lower than the preliminary loan loss reserves established in the preceding first quarters, the Company’s reserve estimate for the 2026 tax season proved more precise. This improved accuracy was largely attributable to the nonrenewal of a major Tax Provider contract that drove significant RA volume during the 2025 tax season and historically contributed greater variability to credit loss estimates.
Republic
RPS reported net income of
Republic Credit Solutions(1)
RCS reported net income of
Net interest income and program fees benefited from strong origination growth across both RCS line of credit (“LOC”) products and the segment’s installment loan program. However, provision expense increased specifically due to growth in the segment’s
Noninterest expense also increased during the quarter, driven primarily by higher marketing costs. Comparisons to the prior-year period were further impacted by a
Republic Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) is the parent company of
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements in the preceding paragraphs are based on our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the future average balances of the new RPS program launched during June 2026, the future impact to our balance sheet and income statement resulting from changes in interest rates, the yield curve, the ability to develop products and strategies in order to meet the Company’s long-term strategic goals and other future conditions.
Because forward-looking statements relate to future events, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks, and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements. Forward-looking statements are neither historical facts nor guarantees of future performance.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements are discussed in the Company's filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Risk Factors section of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, except as required by applicable law.
Footnotes:
(1) |
| The Company is divided into five reportable segments: Traditional Banking, Warehouse Lending, Tax Refund (“TRS”), Republic Payment Solutions (“RPS”), and Republic Credit Solutions (“RCS”). Management considers Traditional Banking and Warehouse Lending to collectively constitute “Core Bank” or “Core Banking” operations, while TRS, RPS, and RCS collectively constitute |
(2) |
| Provision or Provision for expected credit loss expense includes provisions for on-balance-sheet loans, with changes reflected in the Allowance, or Allowance for credit losses. Provision expense for off-balance-sheet credit exposures is recorded as a component of other noninterest expense, with changes reflected in the Allowance for credit losses on off-balance-sheet credit exposures, which is included in other liabilities on the Company’s balance sheet. |
NM – Not meaningful | ||
NA – Not applicable | ||
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260724090619/en/
Republic Bancorp, Inc.
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
(502) 560-8628
Source: