Good morning and welcome to I2M Quantum Computers third quarter 2026 earnings call. Joining me today are Dr. Jan Goetz, our chief executive officer and co-founder, and Jan Kuerschner, our chief financial officer. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that today's discussion includes forward-looking statements, such as comments on our product and technology roadmap, Customer Demand, System Deliveries and Customer Acceptance, Bookings, Revenue Timing, Operating Plans, Liquidity, and Outlook. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our current expectations. Please refer to today's earnings release, our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, our listing perspectives, and our stock exchange releases for more information on those risks. We will also discuss certain non-IFRS measures, reconciliations to the most directly comparable IFRS measures are provided in our earnings release, available at investors.iqm.tech. With that, I'll turn the call over to Jan Goetz.

Thank you, Chiara, and thank you all for joining us. Q3 was a quarter of strong execution for IQM, supporting our straightforward thesis. We put working quantum computers directly into the hands of our customers and jointly co-develop our product further. Because we optimize and deliver the full stack, we believe this is the fastest path to fault-tolerant quantum computing. This quarter, our thesis continued to turn into contracted deployments and repeatable delivery. During the quarter, we expanded into new geographies, we signed one of our largest contracts to date, and continued to advance our technology roadmap. This momentum reflects the market that is moving in our direction. Let me first comment on the quantum market more broadly. The quantum computing market is moving from research into early commercial deployment. Our latest State of Quantum report shows a six-fold contract market surge since 2021. With deals reaching $2.6 billion in value, 46% of enterprise buyers are now mandating on-premises architecture. That is exactly the market IQM was built for. Since 2021, we have been deploying full-stack quantum computers directly into research, HPC, and AI data centers. We have done and are working on 10 quantum AI integrations, where we connect our quantum computers directly to GPU clusters. We do this in supercomputing environments, both with NVIDIA and AMD systems. These integrations are a market-leading number of quantum AI integrations, which is relevant for the current developments around AI factories. Against this backdrop, let me turn to how we performed. We delivered against the three main drivers we presented in our August earnings call. First, commercial traction, second, product development, and third, financial strength. My remarks will focus on what advanced in each of these three core areas during the quarter. Let me begin with the headlines. First, commercial traction. In Q3, we achieved 42 million euros in new order intake, adding to an already strong order backlog. Out of the backlog, 9 million euros was converted into revenue for the quarter. This means a net growth of 33 million euros in backlog for Q3. When it comes to the actual customers behind these figures, we booked the first order for IQM Hellocene, our error correction platform. The order came from CSC and the Lumi AI Factory, a contract roughly equal in value to our entire 2025 revenue. We also announced a new system order in Japan from Toyo, a repeat enterprise customer. In addition, we expanded into a new geography, Brazil. which extends IQM's presence to major customers across four continents. Second, product development. We produced 250 qubit customer systems which left our factory and are now being installed at the customer sites. This is a key signal to the market about our ability to deliver on our way to error correction. This ability to execute is underpinned by our ongoing FAB expansion which is on track to produce our next generation processor generations. And third, financial strength. We closed the quarter with 260 million euros in cash and have advanced with several grants leading to additional source of income on top of our sales. Our CFO Jan Kuerschner will take you through the numbers. Let's look more closely at our commercial traction. How we drive quantum adoption for use case development and it grows sales through the most important order of the quarter. Customers use our quantum computers to get quantum ready with their organizations. They co-develop use cases, they run case studies and integrate our quantum computers into their workflows. On the enterprise side, adoption is building through skills and industry applications. Our IQM Resonance Cloud now has more than 17,000 registered users. and it is increasingly where enterprises built their first quantum capabilities. For example, in CESA San Paolo, Italy's largest bank, launched an advanced quantum algorithms program through IQM Resonance Cloud that runs on IQM AirWorld, our 54 qubit system. And in July, together with Deutsche Bahn, we published a hybrid quantum classical pipeline for rolling stock planning on real operational data, running end-to-end on IQM hardware. Let's put this into context. At these problem sizes, the performance of quantum computers matches the performance of conventional computers. We are building trust by showing that the technology works for subsets of the actual problem size. It is the working pipeline, the trained team, and the well-framed problem that delivers value to our customers. And this is how we will continue to talk about applications openly and honestly while pushing the technology further. What enables these use cases are our state-of-the-art quantum computers, which we deploy globally. A good reference point is that our customers and partners have published in total over 100 research papers on IQM quantum computers that we have deployed globally. In addition to quantum adoption for use cases, we drive it by deploying error-corrected quantum computers to customers. In July, the CSC Supercomputing Center in Finland selected IQM to deliver an IQM Halocene system. It is named LumiIQ, integrated into their LumiAI factory. LumiIQ is jointly owned by Finland, Czechia, Norway, and Poland, and co-funded by the EuroHPC joint undertaking. It will be hosted in CSC New Data Center in Kajani, alongside one of the world's most powerful supercomputers. The total value of this order was 33 million euros. To make this important deal possible, we announced in September an upgrade path for our quantum computers. LumiIQ will be delivered in three stages. First, an IQM Halocene H4 system in 2027 with 150 physical qubits and early error correction capabilities. Then, an upgrade in 2028 to lower logical error rates and enable real-time error correction. and finally, an IQM Halocene H5 system in 2029. After the final stage, the system is designed to support logical qubits with fast real-time feedback and to run Clifford operations between them. This will enable computations with up to nine fault-tolerant logical qubits using Distance 3 surface code and other more advanced codes, including color codes. Now, why is this important for investors? Three reasons. First, it is a multi-year, sovereign-backed customer relationship that grows with our roadmap. Second, it shows how system value steps up as we move from today's NISQ machines to error-corrected ones in the future. A single Halocene contract is worth a multiple of a typical Radiant system. And third, LumiIQ is on track to become Europe's first superconducting quantum computer with logical qubits, built, owned, and operated in Europe. all with the support from IQM. Especially the third point, the advanced ownership model, is gaining traction globally. In September, we announced that Toyo Corporation in Japan ordered its second IQM system, an IQM Spark for its R&D center in Tokyo. This system joins the IQM Radiance 20 system that will be installed in Japan's Advanced Industrial Science and Technology Quantum Center. Both systems are planned to be delivered over the next three months and operations are planned to begin in early 2027. What stands out here is how Toyo will use the IQM Quantum Computers. It is opening both machines to Japanese universities, startups, research institutes and companies as a testbed for algorithms and for the components that go into superconducting quantum computers. Japan's national strategy targets 10 million domestic quantum users by 2030. Our approach to deliver shared and owned infrastructure supports this strategic goal. In the US, our IQM Radiance 20 system at Oak Ridge National Lab called Pathfinder is now live and operational. Again, it is owned and operated by Oak Ridge's own team. For the first time, the quantum HPC software stack that Oak Ridge developed against simulators is running on a physical quantum computer. We also announced a completely new geographical expansion, our first quantum computer in South America. The Eldorado Research Institute in Campinas, Brazil's largest technology cluster, will install an ICM Spark in the first quarter of 2027. They also receive cloud access through Resonance platform to our 54 qubit system in Europe. Like Toyo, Eldorado will open the system to the universities, startups, and industry partners around it. In summary, this means four customers, four continents, and the same underlying decision. They grow through ownership of a full stack quantum computer with an open software architecture. This is how IQM expands quantum ecosystems globally and delivers technology readiness. As of today, IQM has cumulatively sold 31 full-stack quantum computers worldwide, including Community of Madrid that was announced after the quarter end in October. We have delivered 17 systems to customers, with additional 17 systems currently in production. Next, let's talk about sovereign programs and our US footprint. Governments are treating quantum as a sovereign capability. Confirmed public funding worldwide now stands at about $41 billion. Governments are no longer just funding quantum, they are investing in it and buying it. And we see this in our pipeline. In the US, we opened our first quantum technology center in the University of Maryland's Discovery District. And we welcomed Governor Wes Moore there. In the same building, Microsoft Quantum has opened a quantum hardware maker space. and IQM is one of its seven initial partners on the Quantum Hardware Training Initiative. We joined alongside AMD, Blue Force, Intel, Fermilab, Riverlane and Quantum Motion. With efforts like this, we helped resolve a key bottleneck in our industry. The number of people who have actually built and operated quantum hardware. In Germany, the Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space launched its quantum computing competition with up to 640 million euros in planned funding to develop at least two error-corrected quantum computers for industrial use by 2030. The super pilot consortium, coordinated by ITM together with Infineon Technologies and Zurich Instruments, has been selected as one of six projects to advance to the next phase of the competition. It combines our experience in building and delivering complete systems with Infineon Semiconductor Manufacturing Expertise and Zurich Instruments Industrial Grade Quantum Control. On the European level, IQM has been selected into the first phase of the Grand Challenge Program. This is part of a renewed EU strategy on quantum computing, which will be implemented through the EU Quantum Act. Finally, in Japan, we are supported by the government through NEDO, a joint project with Kyocera and AIST. All these projects support the development of our roadmap, both financially and through joint R&D resources. Now, let me switch gears and turn your attention to our technology roadmap towards fault-tolerant quantum computing. Here, our message is clear and consistent. We measure progress at the level of the system, not a single hero number. In May, our work demonstrating above 99.9% fidelity across all three core operations in a single device was published in the peer-reviewed journal PRX Quantum. These results were also presented by our team during the STUA conference in Gothenburg in August. STUA is a globally leading tech conference for superconducting quantum computers and algorithms, which we co-hosted together with Chalmers University and Scalink. The results we presented A combined fidelity of 99.8% across all three cooperations, made up of 99.98% for single qubit gates, 99.94% for readout, and 99.93% for the two qubit ZZ gate. The ZZ figure is the one I'd like to underline. It isn't a best single measurement, but an average over 40 hours of continuous operation. The gate ran stably for nearly two days. Only one single qubit recalibration and stayed within a few hundreds of a percent within its peak. That kind of stability is what data center integration, long hybrid workflows, and real applications depend on. And it's the performance we're engineering into our next generation customer systems. Based on the fast innovation cycles enabled by our own FAB, We have reached records to one times of 1.6 milliseconds. This is a major stepping stone towards higher gate fidelities in our processors. We know investors are focused on how this performance carries over to larger processors. A good example is that we have now entangled all 54 qubits on an IQM Emerald processor after fully entangling our 20 qubit garnet system earlier. The new 54 qubit result has been achieved with advanced error mitigation that came from bringing our optimized control methods to full processor scale, together with firmware upgrades and cryogenic refinements. And because Emerald is available through our ITM Resonance Cloud and through Amazon Bracket, this isn't a lab result. It is a production system with significantly increased performance to run algorithms, researchers and customers around the world can access today. Our priority for the coming quarters is to demonstrate these results also at the system level on our 150 qubit processors. The first two systems are on schedule for final delivery by year end. We have started unboxing these systems at the customer site and are preparing them for final installation. The next step on our tech roadmap is implementing error correction for our Halocene product line. We made significant progress on the two things that matter as processors scale towards error correction. The first point is running many gates simultaneously without them interfering. This means we have been suppressing leakage and crosstalk significantly. The second point is connectivity. We have achieved a new direct two qubit operation Thank you very much. and we are executing a strong roadmap towards fault-tolerant quantum computing. This quarter, our work has focused on making it real-time, open and testable. Real-time, because IQM Halocene runs NVIDIA Ising calibration, which we contributed and developed together with NVIDIA natively through NVQ-Link. This way, calibration and error correction loops run on hardware the customer owns. It is open, because with NVIDIA CUDA Q, which we adopted in September, the same workload can be compared across codes and architectures on common metrics. And it is testable because researchers can now run these experiments themselves. Our CRISP package carries the same code from simulator to IQM hardware. And at NERSC Supercomputing Center in the US, researchers ran their own surface code memory experiments on IQM resonance. Based on these achievements, we continue executing our ambitious technology roadmap. In 2027, we target our first error correction demonstrators, followed by first customer deliveries, typically 12 to 18 months after each demonstration. And deals like the LumiIQ system for CSE show how that roadmap now translates into contracted customer deployments. Another key ingredient of building fault-tolerant quantum computers for real use cases is the software stack. It's the applications running on top, and of course, AI. IQM's acquisition of Quantistry's asset in July added a cloud-native, AI-powered chemistry and materials platform and an experienced team. We are now integrating that platform into our product solutions. It lets chemists and engineers, not just quantum specialists, from their own use cases, with each step routed to classical HPC or quantum as appropriate. On stable ITM hardware, that is how our customers will identify the use cases where quantum genuinely makes a difference. Our application teams delivered results this quarter that show how hybrid quantum classical workflows are heading. Let me give you two examples how we drive use case adoption with customers and partners. First, with Volkswagen Group Innovation, we cut the classical post-processing of a quantum classical chemistry method with an estimated 248-fold runtime speedup for 100 orbital systems. We validated the results on IQM hardware and applied it in 40-qubit simulations of a reaction pathway relevant to lithium-air batteries. Second, Already some time ago, the German Aerospace Center at HQS Quantum Simulations simulated magnetic excitations in real two-dimensional materials on our cloud at up to 48 qubits. Now, this quarter, we delivered the other half, a classical reference pipeline for strongly correlated materials where standard methods break down, giving a rigorous baseline any future quantum materials results will have to beat. These use cases are enabled by several new methods our teams have developed. Let me give you three examples for that. First, our new QISS method extracts better optimization solutions from today's processors already produced. On our 54 qubit emerald processor, it delivered the same solution quality from noisy hardware as from noiseless simulation. Simulations of deeper noiseless circuits show How it can be competitive with established classical solvers. Second, we released open source error reduction tools for IQM systems that reduce errors without amplifying noise, with one night of code and fully reproducible results. And third, we introduced quantum channel polynomial processing, a new algorithmic framework. This framework lets users trade circuit depth against repetitions. So the same algorithms can scale from today's machines to fault-tolerant ones. In its most precise setting, circuit cost grows only logarithmically with the target accuracy. A common thread here is a view our chief scientist, Ines de Vega, set out well this quarter when she said, Currently, the quantum computer belongs inside a workflow that remains largely classical, alongside CPUs and GPUs in AI and HPC infrastructure. That is exactly where our systems are deployed. We continue developing an open and modular software stack in co-development with our customers and partners. The open source project CRISP that we are supporting is growing and has won the Quantum Effects Award 2026 for Quantum Software. A testimonial for the visionary software architecture we are building. All of these efforts I described so far help our ecosystem to grow. The IQM Research Award drew applicants from 10 regions. Our free quantum summer school put new users on real hardware. And after quarter end, we signed a skills and research agreement with Swinburne University of Technology in Australia. Finally, Our people are our most valuable resource. And I was super proud to see IQM being recognized with two gold and one silver award at this year's Employer Brand Management Awards. We continue building a world-class team in all our global sites to deliver world-leading quantum computers for the well-being of humankind. With that, I will hand over to our CFO, Jan Kuerschner.

Thank you, Jan. Let me talk more about our financials and how we are executing on our revenue projects. As a reminder, we operate in a project-driven market where annual revenue comes from a number of large contracts. We recognize revenue from sales of large, customized quantum computer systems over time and recognize revenue from standardized products at a point in time when control transfers to the customer. Quarterly revenue can therefore look much more volatile than the underlying business and we continue to guide you to look at three metrics together. Order intake in the period. Second, revenue recognized in the period. And third, order backlog at the end of the period. Let's review the third quarter results. Order intake. In the third quarter, we booked 42.2 million euros of new orders, led by the Lumi IQM Halocene contract, as well as systems for Eldorado Research Institute of Brazil and the community of Madrid in Spain. This brings year-to-date order intake to 52.9 million euros. Revenue. First quarter revenue was 8.9 million euros and 17.7 million euros for the first nine months of 2026, compared with 11.9 million euros in the first nine months of 2025, meaning year-over-year growth of 49% for the nine months. Order backlog. We ended the quarter with an order backlog of 102.5 million euros compared with 69.1 million euros at the end of June. We expect 59.5 million euros of our order backlog at the end of Q3 2026 to be recognized as revenue within the next 12 months. Revenue from hardware and services was 8.7 million euros for the quarter and is 17 million euros year-to-date. The remainder comes from the cloud-based usage of our quantum computers and from co-development projects or quantum computing related. Gross margin was 47% for the quarter compared with 46% in the second quarter. Operating loss was €171 million for the quarter and €232 million for the first nine months. As we flagged in August, the third quarter includes €13.5 million of one-time transaction costs related to the completion of our listing. Additionally, under IFRS, we incurred a one-time non-cash share-based listing expense of 127 million euros during the quarter. This represents the non-cash premium of obtaining a public listing via the merger with REC and it represents the excess fair value of shares issued by QM in exchange for the net assets of REC. The underlying growth in our cost base reflects deliberate investment, R&D for our roadmap, the build-out of sales and delivery capacity, and our first full quarter of public company costs. We ended the quarter with a total workforce of 490 employees and external staff compared with 460 at the end of June. Let's now turn to the balance sheet. We ended the quarter with cash and cash equivalents of 260 million euros compared with 309 million euros immediately following our listing on July 2nd. The change reflects operating cash outflow of 48.3 million euros Q3 operating cash flows include 6.2 million euros associated with the July listing. Our cash position provides a runway into the second quarter of 2028. We are reiterating our full year 2026 guidance. Full year order intake of 65 million to 75 million euros and full year revenue of 42 million to 47 million euros. As we said in our August earnings call, 2026 is structurally fourth quarter heavy. The largest part of our full year revenue is tied to the scheduled delivery and customer acceptance of our first 150 qubit systems. We remain confident to deliver the 2026 revenue numbers, given that the two systems have already left our factory and are currently being installed at the customer's site. Because acceptance-based recognition is the main source of timing risk in any quarter, I want to be transparent about how it works. For standardized systems, we recognize revenue at the point when the customer accepts the system, not when it's shipped or installed. Acceptance depends partly on factors on the customer side, such as site readiness, cooling and power infrastructure, and public sector procurement sign-off. Larger, customized projects are recognized over time as milestones are reached. If an acceptance moves by a few weeks across a quarter end, the revenue moves with it. The contract value, the backlog, and the cash profile do not change. As a reminder, revenue only includes commercial sales contracts with quantum computers, cloud, or related services. We are not counting government grants, public funding, or other non-diluted financing as revenue, just plain commercial contracts. We include grant funding as other income in our financial statements. And let me also provide two structural points that will further help with modeling our business. First, fewer larger contracts. As our systems move to higher qubit counts and embedded error correction, contract values rise. A single halocene system is worth a multiple of a radian system. That improves the quality of our order backlog, but it also makes order intake and revenue lumpier and extends conversion from order to revenue to sometimes more than two years. Second, a growing recurring base. As our installed base expands, Service maintenance and upgrade revenue becomes a larger share of the mix. LumiIQ's staged upgrades are a good example of how one customer relationship generates revenue across several years. Our capital allocation priorities are unchanged. Delivering to our customers, achieving our halocene error correction milestones, expanding set capacity, and deepening our cloud and software ecosystem. We will remain disciplined and opportunistic M&A that strengthens our offering as we deal with quantistry. Our focus is on building an enduring long-term profitable leader in quantum computing infrastructure. And with that, I will hand the call back to Jan Goetz.

Thank you, Jan. Let me close with three takeaways from the quarter. First, our commercial and geographic base is broadening. We announced and won new orders in Japan and Brazil. Our first US system is live at Oak Ridge, and enterprises are building skills on IQM hardware through our cloud, while sovereign customers in Europe remain our anchor. Second, our roadmap to fault-tolerant quantum computing is continuing to be contracted. With LumiIQ, a customer is not just buying a single machine, but committing to a multi-year path toward logical qubits on IQM hardware, with system value that steps up as performance does. And third, the fourth quarter is about execution, delivering and achieving acceptance of our first 150 qubit systems, converting backlog into revenue, and building order intake for 2027. For years, the open question in our industry was whether quantum computers could work at all. Today, the question is whether they can be built, delivered, and operated at the pace the world needs them. That is a manufacturing and deployment question as much as a physics one. And it is exactly the question IQM has spent years building the capability to answer. Thank you all for joining us today. Thank you to our customers and partners, to our teams in Espoo, Munich, College Park, and around the world, and to our shareholders for your trust. Our earnings release and presentation are available at www.investors.iqm.tech. Operator, please open the line for questions.

Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. As a reminder, if you wish to ask a question, you will need to press star 1 1 on your telephone, or if you have joined via device audio, click the raise hand button and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star 1 1 again. or click the lower hand button. We will take our first question. Your question comes from Tyler Anderson from Craig Hallam Capital Group. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hi, this is Tyler Anderson on for Richard Shannon. And hello, everybody. It's great to talk to you again. So I wanted to characterize the existing deployments that you already have For the systems that are already in production, how many of these groups are error correction research groups? Or at least, what was the intention as to why they purchased the system? And then I have a follow-up.

Yeah, thanks, Dara, for the question. So the deal that we announced with Lumi CSC, this is a Holocene deal, which is really targeting the error correction functionality. All the other systems that we have sold are either Radiant or Spark. This means, in principle, customers and users, they can run error correction workload there, but they have to implement everything themselves. So it's really basically their development they have to put in, whereas these new Holocene systems This is where we bring in the error correction capabilities.

Okay, are you also supplying the error correction hardware for this?

You mean for the HelloScene machine?

Yes.

Yeah, so this is an upgrade path that the customer takes there. And as part of the upgrade, also the error correction capabilities will be deployed. So for example, the real time part, I think will only come with the second delivery, and so on. So the system kind of will grow in functionality over time. But at the end, yes, there will be a full functionality in the system with the customer.

Okay, that's great. And then you had mentioned you had open sourced error reduction tools. Are you speaking to error suppression or is this error mitigation?

Yeah, so we have basically put these tools also on our cloud, and people can use it. And the focus here has been error mitigation. I'm not 100% sure if there's also error suppression in there, and this is something we would need to double-check.

OK, thank you all. Thank you.

Thank you. We will take our next question. Your question comes from Jesse Soberson from U.S. Bancorp. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hi, guys. Hi, everyone. Thanks for taking my questions today. So you reported 31 systems sold, 17 delivered, and 17 are currently in production. So I think that implies that there's three that are being produced with no end customer in mind. Are those captive systems that you're building, or what's the reason behind this?

and all systems have a customer tied to it. There's no systems that we're just building for the shelf.

And then I guess I'm just curious on with the Sorry, with the deliveries that you have, can you provide a status update? I know that there was a two-system SESCA contract in Spain. We were expecting those deliveries to come through in June. I got the commentary here on the 150 qubit systems being delivered to customer sites, but is there any detail on the SESCA contract?

Yeah, thanks for this. Well, first of all, the other two 150-qubit systems that are currently being deployed, so they are already at the customer site, the Jesco system is not yet delivered to the customer. We are facing a slight delay here, but we're not worried about that. That will slip into the beginning of next year, and it does not concern our revenue guidance that we were giving on that.

Okay, great. Yeah, I think that, you know, it speaks really well to us having the 150 qubit machines on site. And I think it's looking very interesting for the fourth quarter. So I appreciate you guys taking my questions. Thank you. Thanks.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Felix Henrichsen from Nordea. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hi guys, I have a couple questions, take them one by one.

Firstly, the Lumi upgrades that you mentioned, are those included in the 33 million contract value or are those incremental revenue on top of that?

Thanks for the question, Felix. Yes, those are included in the 33 million. Got it. That's very clear. And then, you know, you called out the IPO transaction related costs, 13 and a half million for Q3.

Are there any sort of one-time non-recurring listing or other related costs that we still should expect to be included in the queue for financials?

Thank you. And by now we've recorded them all. Great. Crystal clear. Thanks.

Thank you. We will take our next question. And the question comes from Mike Harrison from Rothschild & Co. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Oh, hi, guys. Thanks so much for taking the question. They're more sort of financially focused than technologically focused. The first is, if I take your ordered intake and revenue guidance, I think it's implying a backlog will fall to about 90 million. by the end of the year. So I just want to double check that that tallied with your expectations for what 4Q looks like. And then secondly, if I take what you're saying about the amount of backlog that gets recognized in the next 12 months, I think that's implying that your nine month 27 versus nine month 26 revenue growth rate would be tracking at about 85% year on year. And I just wanted to kind of sanity check with you guys whether that's a roughly sensible glide path for how you think the quantum market evolves, whether you think that's a bit fast or a bit slow, just kind of helping me understand how I should contextualize that.

Okay, let's start with the first part. As we repeated our guidance, one could make the math and say that approximately 20 to 25 million of revenue will be recognized in Q4. And then that's what we expect. And if you deduct that from the The 102 million that we have currently as the end of the quarter, that doesn't arrive at the 90 million. However, that being said, we are still expecting some more orders to come in. Soren Hein, Lisa Kuske, Blair Robertson Soren Hein, Lisa Kuske, Blair Robertson Soren Hein, Lisa Kuske, Blair Robertson Soren Hein, Lisa Kuske, Blair Robertson

Based on the performance of how we are doing overall, of course, we are super focused on execution and this usually includes two points. One is the product and technology development. So building better computers and the other one is the commercial traction. But still, there might be fluctuation quarter to quarter. So I think there's some uncertainty here. and the other thing is of course that we are really pioneering the field of deploying quantum computers to supercomputing center and doesn't mean that the whole market is kind of following at the same pace necessarily.

Okay, thanks very much. I do have a follow-up but I'll jump back in the queue.

Thank you. We will take our next question. The question comes from Krish Sankar from TD Cohen. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hi, thanks so much for taking my questions. This is Stephen calling on behalf of Krish. The first one I have is regarding the new order intake for the quarter. Just kind of curious, besides the halocene system for For Lumi, AI, and the Toyo and also the Brazil orders, were there any other system orders beyond that within the $42 million intake? Or is the remaining balance potentially from cloud bookings and future system usage?

There is some cloud in there, but not really material. There are some other systems in there which we have not yet announced, but that will be happening soon.

Gotcha. Helpful. And then as my follow-up, in terms of error correction milestones and strategy, so I understand you guys are pursuing and developing multiple technologies, you know, surface Thank you very much. Thank you. Yeah, well, thanks for these questions.

I will take them. So on the error correction approach, I think it's always important to check where we are coming from and then where we are planning to go. So when we started, the whole error correction research was not as developed as it is today. And kind of the leading approach was the surface code. and this is why we designed our first systems to support this and this is basically the crystal architecture that we have chosen and all our systems that we have shipped so far except for the Czech one are actually targeting this But then we have published these very nice results on the barbell codes, so a different approach, which is more efficient. So the goal is really to lean towards the barbell codes as we move on. But in principle, of course, you could even think about systems where you have in a way both. Because on the barbell codes and the QLDPC in general, there are still some, let's say, topics which are open to research, for example, the magic state distillation. We know that it works with the surface code architecture and, let's say, a de-risking or fallback option would be to do this part still with the surface code, for example. So in a nutshell, the goal is to really move to the barbell codes, but having the surface code in a back pocket to de-risk the approach. And then when it comes to this ratio between physical and logical qubit, this really depends also on the target error rate on the logical side that you are aiming for. and it is also a moving target because it also depends heavily on the physical error rate. So it's really hard to give like one number that captures it all. Overall, the barbell codes that we have developed are of course much more efficient than the surface codes and this means you really kind of gain their order of magnitude in this ratio between surface code and barbell codes.

Thank you so much, Jan.

Thank you. We will take our next question. The next question comes from Valtteri Rossi from Danske Bank. Please go ahead, your line is open.

Hi guys, I'm Valtteri Rossi from Danske Bank. My question is about cash flow. So you state that the current cash runway extends into Q2 28. So what assumptions for revenue, customer advances and capital expenditures Do you have that underpin set runway? And kind of a follow-up, looking at your year-to-date operating cash flow, it was roughly 99 million negative. So how much of that is recurring operational cash burn and what should we expect to be this kind of normalized cash burn in Q4 and 2027? Thank you.

Okay, well thanks for your question. We're not yet giving guidance on 2028 since you were asking on revenues, what to expect for that year. So it's a bit difficult to answer that. We do of course anticipate a growth in revenues and as from the previous questions and our guidance that we give on the The order book and what is going to be what will be recognized over the next 12 months. We kind of can derive a number here. However, as I said, we're not giving guidance yet. And so that I will need to ask for your patience for our next earnings call here. and yeah we had for concerning this year and and the operating cash flow we were stating that there are some some expenses tied to the to the listing and then the and that was 13 million so the rest of that operating cash flow is is the regular cash flow so so so not and we can interpolate the same for Q4 in that sense.

All right.

You probably expected something more concrete. Sorry for that, but yeah.

Yeah, I understood. Thank you.

Thank you. Once again, if you wish to ask a question, please press star 1 1 on your telephone or click the raise hand button on your screen. We will take our next question. The next question comes from Tyler Anderson from Craig Hallam Capital Group. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hi, everyone. Thank you for taking my follow up. I guess what I'm really trying to figure out here is We have this star topology that can now do error correction. And from my perspective, if I was doing error correction research on superconductors, that would seem to be a thing that I would want to get into so that I can develop on the platform for the future. Now, we have this in 27 being delivered. And then there's the mix of the crystal lattice and the star topology, which, again, It seems like one of those, how should I say, like a change in regime, just a changing tide in how things are done. And so what I'm really trying to find out is, you know, with this install base that you have, it would seem that there are a good amount of people who would want to upgrade to the new system, or at least one of the two systems, but then also It would seem that this would attract new customers as well. And so I just want to kind of get an understanding, you know, where do you have your expectations for Holocene? And, you know, is this more, do you think this is going to attract more interest from customers that you haven't reached yet? Or do you think that this is going to drive an upgrade cycle with those who already have a installed and up and running quantum computer?

Yeah, well, thanks. I think that's a very valid question. And generally, we do think both will happen and we have seen both happening. So we have customers, they went through the upgrade path and we have good indications that this upgrade path is also attractive for others. So we do think that our current customer base will continue to invest into our roadmap. And this is one thing. But then, I mean, you have seen the numbers. We saw 31 systems. Some of them are actually already upgraded, so the number of customers is smaller. But then if you just count the number of supercomputing centers, HPC centers, data centers around the world, obviously, you come up with a much higher number. Also, I think a good potential to open new markets and gain new customer attraction. As we have shown this quarter, right, with Brazil, for example, we have now the first customer in South America. And we do think that there is a way to do both, to serve our existing customers with new and better products. And at the same time, of course, then win additional customers on top of it.

Thank you for the color and also thank you for the logical memory experiment. I appreciate it when we point out the memory.

Thank you.